
But today was reminded of the real thing. Taking the boat rather than the tube, and with the normal high speed Cabot out of service (engine problem - again - and good riddance, not that keen on it), we traveled a bit slower but in more style on the M.V. Kingwood.
At the front was a plague, "Dunkirk 1940". For the Kingwood is one of the little boats that rescued the British Army in its hour of need.
Puts the hassles of the tube into context!
5 comments:
Aaah, the Dunkirk spirit. There's nothing that appeals more to the British psyche than a glorious retreat.
Actually I always think that Dunkirk itself was a victory - an extremely successful evacuation.
It was before that the BEF got defeated (and we don't talk about that)!
She never went to Dunkirk , she was commissioned along with a few other vessels of Joseph mears fleet. However their steam propulsion prevented them from crossing the channel to Dunkirk , their steam boilers seized up with the salt water. It’s a common misconception that the Kingwood went to Dunkirk , she was commissioned but never went. Princess Freda is a good example of a Thames passenger boat that actually went as she was built in 1926 with a Perkins 6 cylinder Diesel engine thus enabling her to cross the channel and partake in operation Dynamo. Princess Freda currently runs on the upriver service from Westminster to Hampton court.
Thanks Alex - I was working from the sign I saw inside, useful to get a bit more info. I'm guessing they meant they tried to be part of the Dunkirk operation (even if weren't in the end)
I shall try to go on Princess Freda sometime (last time did that route went on MV Connaught)
Yes she was commissioned that’s why she sports the sign , Viscount and Marchinoness were also commissioned by the navy to cross the channel to Dunkirk but were unable to , It has been said that they operated as hospital ships for the returning wounded around gravesend. Connaughts a lovely boat same design as kingwood.
Post a Comment